<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EF 17-40L vs. EF-S 18-55</title>
	<link>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/</link>
	<description>Photography by Will Koffel</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-40135</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 02:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-40135</guid>
					<description>Thanks for posting your test results. I have a 20d and have been recently researching the 17-40L. I do have a very nice copy of the kit lens though.

Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting your test results. I have a 20d and have been recently researching the 17-40L. I do have a very nice copy of the kit lens though.</p>
<p>Thanks again!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: joaedmonds</title>
		<link>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-39866</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-39866</guid>
					<description>Hello, 
Can you help me to find 
The best soft to PC-where to buy, join site &amp;#38; other tipe to do a home online business. 
With best regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
Can you help me to find<br />
The best soft to PC-where to buy, join site &amp; other tipe to do a home online business.<br />
With best regards.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kaj</title>
		<link>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-33645</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 06:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-33645</guid>
					<description>thank you, it has been a great help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you, it has been a great help!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: arilia</title>
		<link>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-4761</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-4761</guid>
					<description>T.Y. I appreciate your demonstration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T.Y. I appreciate your demonstration.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: abel rca</title>
		<link>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-4504</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-4504</guid>
					<description>thank you. you have been most helpfull :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you. you have been most helpfull :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-1126</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-1126</guid>
					<description>Yes, Tim, this was the Mark I version, I've made a note in the original post to that point.  Thanks for pointing that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Tim, this was the Mark I version, I&#8217;ve made a note in the original post to that point.  Thanks for pointing that out.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-1041</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 05:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-1041</guid>
					<description>Will,

Nice comparison.  I just wanted to point out that Canon seems to
have changed the 18-55mm kit lens when releasing the 350D/RebelXT.
The one you tested is the &quot;Mark I&quot; version that came with the 300D/Rebel,
right?  Supposedly (according to the review on dpreview.com) the &quot;Mark II&quot;
has sharpened up the edges at 18mm in exchange for making the lens less sharp
at f8, as I recall.  Anyway, this is the Mark I version you tested, right?

Regards,
Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will,</p>
<p>Nice comparison.  I just wanted to point out that Canon seems to<br />
have changed the 18-55mm kit lens when releasing the 350D/RebelXT.<br />
The one you tested is the &#8220;Mark I&#8221; version that came with the 300D/Rebel,<br />
right?  Supposedly (according to the review on dpreview.com) the &#8220;Mark II&#8221;<br />
has sharpened up the edges at 18mm in exchange for making the lens less sharp<br />
at f8, as I recall.  Anyway, this is the Mark I version you tested, right?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Tim
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-816</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 22:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-816</guid>
					<description>Will,
Thank you very much for putting your time into this for us curious photographers. I'm personally blown away by the total lack of appreciation by the people who left comments. I know it took a lot of time and effort to create this page. I admit, I would like to have seen the mm to mm comparison and same with aperature to aperature. However, it's not your personal responsibilty to the world to do such detailed comparisons. I thank you again for your unselfish contribution to the photography world.

As for the rest of you, you should be ashamed of yourselves.

Gary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will,<br />
Thank you very much for putting your time into this for us curious photographers. I&#8217;m personally blown away by the total lack of appreciation by the people who left comments. I know it took a lot of time and effort to create this page. I admit, I would like to have seen the mm to mm comparison and same with aperature to aperature. However, it&#8217;s not your personal responsibilty to the world to do such detailed comparisons. I thank you again for your unselfish contribution to the photography world.</p>
<p>As for the rest of you, you should be ashamed of yourselves.</p>
<p>Gary
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lukasz Stebelski</title>
		<link>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-612</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-612</guid>
					<description>Great comparison.

Anyone did a test of 18-55 vs. 17-40L at its edges, ie: at 18mm and 4.0 and 40mm and 4.0?

I personally have the 17-40L, which I bought right away with the 350d (without having the 18-55 before), but now consider selling it off to get a faster prime ie. 28 1.8 and would then need to complement it with a 18-55 for the wide angle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comparison.</p>
<p>Anyone did a test of 18-55 vs. 17-40L at its edges, ie: at 18mm and 4.0 and 40mm and 4.0?</p>
<p>I personally have the 17-40L, which I bought right away with the 350d (without having the 18-55 before), but now consider selling it off to get a faster prime ie. 28 1.8 and would then need to complement it with a 18-55 for the wide angle.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-605</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 20:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fountainphoto.com/2004/05/10/canon-ef-17-40l-vs-ef-s-18-55/#comment-605</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the comparison. I only have the kit lens now, but i'm waiting on the new EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS lens to come out. Although I have been looking at this 17-40mm L for quite some time now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comparison. I only have the kit lens now, but i&#8217;m waiting on the new EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS lens to come out. Although I have been looking at this 17-40mm L for quite some time now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
